Friday, June 12, 2015

My appeal to Janhavi Gadkar, an old classmate from St. Columba


Even though I am 35 years old, I don't feel it. Being in academic research and living in New York City has bestowed upon me this feeling of perennial youth. But sometimes meeting or hearing about someone from the past makes me realize how much time has passed. An old classmate from my school, St. Columba in South Bombay was arrested in India for driving drunk and killing two people after hitting their cab head on. Janhavi Gadkar was so drunk that she didn't realize she was driving in the opposite direction on the highway. Reports say she slept for 6 hours after the accident, waking up hung over. That's what alcohol does to one's senses. You don't even realize the impact of your actions after you have directly caused the death of two people---you can still doze off peacefully.

At 35, she is the VP of legal affairs at Reliance---no ordinary feat. If I remember correctly, she came from a pretty middle-class background like me---both parents worked to make a living and give her the best. And yet, with all her education and opportunities, she did not seem to know that merely waiting for two hours does not just wear alcohol off from one's blood stream. Or worse---she did not care. Do educated people really not know that alcohol does not just wear off within minutes? Today when I see headlines describing her as a "35 year old lawyer who killed two people", I realize how old I am and how far we have all come. I feel the weight of adulthood. Our decisions can change the course of our lives, the lives of others. Her terrible and reckless decision ended the lives of two people---both breadwinners of their respective families and moreover, it has ruined her life. Not everyone has the moral constitution of Salman Khan to live with the guilt of having killed fellow-humans. I wonder how many times she must go over that fateful night in her head, wishing she would've taken a cab instead. So please----do NOT under any circumstances drive under the influence. Just take a cab so you don't have to live with the terrible, all-consuming guilt of having done something you can never undo.

I saw her photo in the news reports and even though it has been years, I recognized her face. I remember her in ponytails and glasses. When we were guileless little 3rd graders in red and white uniforms, a random eye-exam drive in school revealed that she and I were among the few who needed glasses. I was excited and curious to wear this contraption on my face. But she cried. Later, we took an art class together. And these are my vague, foggy memories of her. And now her face is all over the internet. I see comment threads where her drinking was criticized---our Indian culture vultures are out there questioning her character, her divorced status, her being with men and drinking so late, even bringing up her upbringing because somehow at age 35 parents must still babysit us. A newspaper's headline, pointlessly claimed that colleagues said she was a "hardworking and good person". It is frustrating to me that we all need a character analysis for a person rather than just focus on the crime they committed. None of this matters. It is just noise. If she would've taken a cab home or spent the night at a friend's and not killed two people by driving head-on into their cab, none of this would've made it into the realm of public discourse. I am a divorced, career woman who celebrates career milestones with male colleagues and does occasionally enjoy a glass of wine. I would not drive while under the influence of alcohol or even if I felt I was so tired that I might fall asleep at the wheel. All one needs is a basic respect for human life and a fundamental understanding of how alcohol can cloud judgment, dull the senses and endanger the lives of others.

Janhavi's parents are probably trying very hard to get her the best legal representation right now. I don't blame them---they are parents. She too is likely doing everything right now to get out of this situation she has gotten herself into. But if by some fluke, she happens to chance upon my blog, I want her to step back and first and foremost, to herself, accept the enormity of what she has done. Two people are dead. No matter what she does or how the court treats this case, those two people will never come back. Children have lost their father, wives have lost their husbands. I want Janhavi to imagine her father or mother being crushed under the weight of metal because someone was too careless to value their lives. And then finally, I appeal to her sense as a human being to consider accepting guilt and punishment rather than fighting it and escaping like so many have done because our judiciary is overburdened and not as effective as it should be in punishing drunk drivers. If she serves out her sentence, helps the families of the deceased and then dedicates her life to spreading awareness about the impact of drunk driving, then there is some hope for redemption. But if like Salman Khan and so many others in our country guilty of this crime, she chooses to abuse our flawed system to her advantage, seeking loopholes to evade imprisonment, then she will most certainly lose our respect, the respect of the people in her past and her present---her peers. At 35, you achieved such accolades and an enviable position in your career, Janhavi. So do something that nobody else has done before in India. Accept guilt. Serve your term. Take this horrible experience, your acute and dire decision of one night and change it into a chapter of redemption, of sincere atonement. There is a lot you can and must do to help the families of the men who died. Most importantly, as an advocate, there is a lot you can still do to restore our faith in the legal system by accepting responsibility and raising awareness about drunk driving, maybe even fight for harsher sentences for drunk drivers after your incarceration. Is it idealistic and silly of me to expect that you will just admit guilt and go to prison for a good chunk of your life? Perhaps. But that is your only hope to keep your dignity intact after what you have done. You cannot bring back the people who died that night. However, you can help prevent future tragedies and you can change your role in this story from a heartless, reckless brat who killed two people to a human being who despite a devastating mistake and thorough lapse in judgement, still displayed some integrity and goodness of character.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Beautifully written. I agree with all your points.

Anonymous said...

Hi Aditi,

Fair enough but will you be willing to do the same thing , if you were in her position? Will you forego your career and life at stake for the crime you committed, however unethical or irrational it may sound?? Its easy to advise others but when you go through the same experience, its not possible to think selfless and risk your own life. I am sure you wont accept your guilt and surrender to the punishment so please think before advising others.

Anonymous said...

Mam, siting in newyork, its easier said than done. People here die in more numbers every night than probably animals do there. People who have shifted in other countries and doing absolutely nothing for the country have no right to comment on state of affairs in the country. Earning a respectable lifestyle takes a lot here. Lets not overburden her to become a masiha and do charity.

Aditi said...

First of, just because I live in New York does not mean I cannot have opinions about what goes on in India. That is an extremely close-minded and dumb outlook. Shame on you for coming here to use my geographical location to assume that I'm doing nothing for my country and then apply this terribly weak logic to defend a drunk driver. Secondly, just because people die in accidents in India, does not mean people shouldn't be punished or expected to serve their term. Taking responsibility for her actions is NOT CHARITY. My parents and family live in India. I have an uncle who was killed in a hit and run. And as a conscientious person who would not make such terribly reckless decisions, I have a right to demand that she do the right thing here. If you feel comfortable with her decisions for that night then may the universe have mercy on the lives of your loved ones who have to travel in the very same streets and freeways where people drink and drive. As for what I would do--I would not drink and drive. Ever. And if my actions somehow lead to the death of a person, I would not be able to forgive myself and accept any punishment meted out to me. You people have zero respect for human life if you think your lousy arguments are somehow going to refute anything I've said in my article.

Anonymous said...

Good article Aditi and says everything I would've said! The two comments above are mind boggling. How does it even matter where you live?! What amazing things was Janhavi Gadkar doing for her country living in India as a corporate lawyer who routinely drove drunk? Cannot believe there are idiots in this world who would come here to defend her and question your perspective which merely asks the guilty party to take responsibility and serve her sentence. This is probably why justice is never served in India. People don't realize that defending the person is defending their crime and it could've very easily have been their parents in the taxi. How stupid to say that she'd be a masiha doing charity for accepting guilt after she killed two people! Incredible India!

Sanjay said...

Dear Aditi,

I carefully read your appeal , I appreciate & respect your thoughts as human being , If you feel the death of two innocent people so deeply & being an Indian origin you are quite aware a judiciary system in India,
Why don't you come forward & fought the case against her to make justice with deceased ones ?

Thank you,

Sanjay

Aditi said...

Sanjay: I cannot fight the case. I am not a lawyer. I believe in India the prosecution is the state versus the defendant and so the prosecuting lawyers will be government attorneys. But as a citizen I do have opinions and sincerely believe that she should serve her term and do something to redeem herself considering she herself is a lawyer.

Suja said...

This idea that someone living outside of India cannot have opinions about incidents in India is a classic kneejerk and defensive argument. Like saying "how dare you criticize us even though you no longer live here" while forgetting that when they say "us" they are including criminals, corrupt politicians, drunk drivers and defending them as well. Drunk driving is a social issue in almost every country. India does not belong to you because you happen to live there. If this Gadkar woman takes responsibility, accept guilt, serves her term like you suggest and does something good with her life we can at least think of forgiving her. Otherwise she is just another one of those rich spoiled people in India who are above the law and don't care who they kill or injure.